Get tales like these delivered straight to your inbox. Join The 74 E-newsletter
This story was printed in collaboration with Headway, a brand new initiative at The New York Occasions. Chalkbeat and Headway have been posing questions concerning the presidential election to educators and highschool college students since February. Now we have heard from greater than 1,000 college students and 200 lecturers throughout the nation.
This presidential election yr, younger Individuals are navigating a chaotic world of knowledge, typically with restricted instruments to differentiate what’s credible, what’s questionable, and what’s downright false.
A latest survey of greater than 1,000 youngsters carried out by the Information Literacy Venture discovered that whereas many younger individuals can detect photos generated by synthetic intelligence with ease, they battle to distinguish information from commentary and commercials and usually encounter conspiracy theories on social media. Eight in 10 respondents mentioned they believed no less than a kind of conspiracy theories.
Younger, first-time voters and their friends informed us that they usually encountered false data on-line concerning the traditionally shut election between Vice President Kamala Harris and former President Donald J. Trump. Some lecturers have devoted complete lesson plans this fall to serving to college students higher perceive media literacy and fact-checking.
And lots of college students have informed us they’ve gained confidence in recognizing falsehoods. We requested greater than 1,000 college students about what suggestions them off {that a} piece of knowledge may be false or deceptive, what’s their strategy to verifying data, and what recommendation they’ve for different youngsters. Right here’s what we heard.
Responses have been edited and condensed for size and readability.
How teenagers know if data is sketchy, made up or manipulated
“If the content material I’m seeing is triggering an excessive emotional response in me — rage, concern or pleasure, to call just a few — with out providing nuanced context, it leads me to suppose that it may be designed to mislead. Once I encounter one thing that appears completely sure about morally and politically advanced subjects, such because the Israel-Hamas battle, with out acknowledging different views or uncertainties, I think it’s oversimplifying actuality to push an agenda.”
— Sena Chang, 18
Faculty freshman at Princeton College in New Jersey
“Articles that sound sketchy, made up, or manipulated are a crimson flag. Some media sources do away with the bits and items of context that make a scenario comprehensible. And media shops typically contradict one another. Examine and cross-check media. When a real piece of media spreads like wildfire, some media shops will attempt to get consideration from the scenario and find yourself spreading lies concerning the scenario. That’s why I discover most articles about common controversies annoyingly eye-rolling.”
— Antonette Davis, 14
Freshman at Central Excessive Faculty in Philadelphia
A single supply doesn’t minimize it for verifying what’s true
“I confirm my data by getting it from a number of sources, not simply individuals on-line who’re crediting the unique article I learn. I additionally have a look at the knowledge introduced within the article from the angle of an individual who doesn’t know something concerning the matter and see if the article and the concepts introduced nonetheless make sense.”
— Yoni Zacks, 17
Senior on the Blake Faculty in Minneapolis.
“Most of the time I look it up on Google and examine it on a extra dependable web site. For instance, if an article makes a declare a couple of piece of laws, I attempt to discover the complete textual content of the cited laws to raised perceive what it’s saying.”
— Olivia Garrison, 17
Graduated in 2023 from Davidson Academy in Reno, Nevada
“There’s a device known as Google Reverse Picture Search that I take advantage of to verify the origins of viral photos or memes to see the place they first appeared and in the event that they’ve been repurposed out of context. Throughout occasions just like the presidential debate, I additionally checked out a number of web sites providing real-time fact-checking like The New York Occasions to assist contextualize what I used to be listening to and determine when what the candidates had been saying was misinformation.”
— Sena Chang
“To confirm data, I attempt to hear on to candidates or their campaigns. I discover that is the simplest option to perceive the candidate’s coverage plans, opinions on sure points, and general decorum. Whereas commentary may be useful, it typically consists of opinions that make me understand sure issues a sure means. Subsequently, I discover it essential to instantly hear from a politician first. Afterward, I take heed to and watch video media with commentary. It helps me evaluate my understanding to another person’s and make clear issues I may not have absolutely understood.”
— Meghan Pierce, 18
Freshman on the College of Illinois Urbana-Champaign in Champaign, Illinois
How younger individuals navigate a world of misinformation
“As a youngster, I get a variety of my data from social media. I do know many different youngsters get their data this fashion, too, so my phrase of recommendation is to pay attention to the algorithm and the way you’re fed data normally from one aspect. You’re not getting the whole story, so do your analysis as a substitute of trusting one supply!”
— Emma Luu, 17
Junior at Pine Creek Excessive Faculty in Colorado Springs, Colorado
“Examine something you suppose is deceptive with a fast search and cross-check if it’s reliable or not.”
— Arnav Goyal, 14
Freshman at Olentangy Liberty Excessive Faculty in Powell, Ohio
“Develop into conscious of media bias, and do your greatest to contemplate completely different views and keep open-minded whereas being conscious of media bias.”
— Lucas Robbins, 17
Senior at Mandela Worldwide Magnet Faculty in Santa Fe, New Mexico
“My (unpopular) take is that fact-checking is simpler than it appears. … Social media serves as an integral egalitarian information supply the place anybody can create and share major supply data irrespective of the place they dwell on the planet. Nonetheless, utilizing social media as a sole supply of knowledge may be harmful. Typically even recognizing satirical information sources is tough — I’ve been a sufferer of pondering The Onion was an actual information supply. You don’t must analysis each single headline you ever see. The web may be an overload of knowledge at instances, and selecting to disconnect is a talent younger individuals want. Nonetheless, in the event you see one thing that raises eyebrows, understanding the context is only a Google search away.”
— Kush Kaur, 17
Freshman at Collin Faculty in McKinney, Texas
Youngsters are inundated every day with a mixture of credible data and pretend information. Out of necessity, they’re sharpening their instincts to determine misinformation and constructing expertise to confirm or debunk it. Their recommendation is evident: Keep conscious of algorithmic affect, keep away from counting on a single supply, and do not forget that it’s OK to step again when all of it feels overwhelming.
Want extra insights? Discover the assets beneath.
Caroline Bauman is the deputy managing editor for engagement at Chalkbeat. Attain her at cbauman@chalkbeat.org.
Erica Meltzer is the nationwide editor at Chalkbeat, the place she covers schooling coverage and politics. Attain her at emeltzer@chalkbeat.org
This story was initially printed by Chalkbeat. Chalkbeat is a nonprofit information website masking instructional change in public colleges. Join their newsletters at ckbe.at/newsletters.
Get tales like these delivered straight to your inbox. Join The 74 E-newsletter